Nichols v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.

261 A.D. 1118, 27 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9031
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 30, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 A.D. 1118 (Nichols v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 261 A.D. 1118, 27 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Decedent, a boy just over three years of age, died as the result of a collision of the automobile in which he was riding with a truck belonging to the defendant Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc. Verdicts in an action for negligence have been recovered, one under sections 119 and 120 of the Decedent Estate Law for $6,000, the other under section 130 of the same law for $10,000. The evidence sustains the finding of negligence. The verdicts are excessive. The first should be reduced to $2,000 and the second to $8,000 and if a stipulation be filed consenting to such reduction, the judgment as so modified should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment and order reversed, on the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days after the service of a copy of the order entered hereon with notice of the entry, the plaintiff shall stipulate to reduce the verdict to $2,000, damages under sections 119 and 120, Decedent Estate Law, and $8,000, under section 130, Decedent Estate Law. If such a stipulation be filed the judgment as reduced and the order denying the motion for a new trial, are affirmed, with costs. The appeal by the- defendant Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., as to Joseph G. Nichols is dismissed under the stipulation filed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, and Bliss, JJ., concur; Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jordan v. Smyk
262 A.D. 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1118, 27 N.Y.S.2d 150, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-socony-vacuum-oil-co-nyappdiv-1941.