Nichols v. Secrest Engineered Products, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols v. Secrest Engineered Products, Inc.

850 S.W.2d 437, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 550, 1993 WL 118515

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 1993·No. No. 62578·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the award of the Administrative Law Judge and denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) reversing the award of the Administrative Law Judge and denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Nichols v. Secrest Engineered Products, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 437, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 550, 1993 WL 118515 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

850 S.W.2d 437 (Nichols v. Secrest Engineered Products, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.