Nichols v. Roy Brown

Supreme Court of Florida

Nichols v. Roy Brown

33 So. 2d 161, 159 Fla. 897, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1016

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 6, 1948·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The decree in favor of appellee in this case should be re *898 versed and the cause remanded with direction that decree be entered in favor of the appellant on authority of our opinions and judgments in Kester v. Bostwick, 153 Fla. 437, 15 So. (2nd) 201; Tindel v. Griffin, 157 Fla. 156, 25 So. (2nd) 200 and Goodman v. Carter, 158 Fla. 112, 27 So. (2nd) 748.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, BUFORD, SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The decree in favor of appellee in this case should be re *898 versed and the cause remanded with direction that decree be entered in favor of the appellant on authority of our opinions and judgments in Kester v. Bostwick, 153 Fla. 437, 15 So. (2nd) 201; Tindel v. Griffin, 157 Fla. 156, 25 So. (2nd) 200 and Goodman v. Carter, 158 Fla. 112, 27 So. (2nd) 748.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, BUFORD, SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Nichols v. Roy Brown, 33 So. 2d 161, 159 Fla. 897, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1016 (Fla. 1948).

Pincite

33 So. 2d 161 (Nichols v. Roy Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related