Nichols v. People

40 Ill. 395
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 395 (Nichols v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. People, 40 Ill. 395 (Ill. 1866).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The prisoner was indicted in the Court of Common Pleas of the city of Aurora, in the county of Kane, for larceny. The indictment charged that the defendant, late of the city of Aurora, on, etc., one horse of the value of $100, one single covered buggy of the value of $80, and one single harness of the value of $30, then and there being found, of the goods and chattels of Joel Jenks, did then and there feloniously steal, take and drive away, etc. The venue in the margin is stated in the usual form.

The prisoner was found guilty and sentenced to the penitentiary for one year, a motion for a new trial having been overruled and exception taken. A motion in arrest of judgment was also overruled, and unnecessarily excepted to, as such a motion saves itself upon the record, without the necessity of a bill of exceptions, that being necessary only when it is important to get some extrinsic matter upon the record.

Hpon the motion for a new trial, the jury were the judges of the intention with which the property was taken by the prisoner, and with their decision we will not interfere, especially as we think the evidence justified the finding that the property was taken with a felonious intent.

As to the want of a venue in the body of the indictment, the answer to that is, that no motion was made to quash the indictment, and the want of a venue cannot be taken advantage of after verdict. Grim. Code, § 163; Scates’ Comp. 503.

Perceiving no error in the record, the judgment must he affirmed

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackstone Shop v. Ashman
250 Ill. App. 401 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
People v. Ross
243 Ill. App. 427 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
People v. Zlotincke
152 Ill. App. 363 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1909)
State v. Beesskove
85 P. 376 (Montana Supreme Court, 1906)
Patting v. Spring Valley Coal Co.
98 F. 811 (Seventh Circuit, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ill. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-people-ill-1866.