Nichols v. Patterson

670 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1996 WL 86758
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1996·No. No. 95-850·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Anicet v. Gant, 580 So.2d 273, 275, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 181 (Fla.1991); Mujica v. Turner, 582 So.2d 24, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 592 So.2d 681 (Fla.1991).

PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Patterson, 670 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1996 WL 86758 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

670 So. 2d 112 (Nichols v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mujica v. Turner
582 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Anicet v. Gant
580 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)