Nichols v. Patterson

670 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1996 WL 86758
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1996
DocketNo. 95-850
StatusPublished

This text of 670 So. 2d 112 (Nichols v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Patterson, 670 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1996 WL 86758 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Anicet v. Gant, 580 So.2d 273, 275, 277 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 181 (Fla.1991); Mujica v. Turner, 582 So.2d 24, 25 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 592 So.2d 681 (Fla.1991).

PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mujica v. Turner
582 So. 2d 24 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Anicet v. Gant
580 So. 2d 273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 So. 2d 112, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1934, 1996 WL 86758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-patterson-fladistctapp-1996.