Nichols v. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy
This text of 618 P.2d 1003 (Nichols v. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this judicial review proceeding the briefs demonstrated considerable confusion about just who did what and to whom. The record is not much help, and counsel for the agency, try as he might, was not successful in relieving the gloom. Petitioner requests that we appoint a master under ORS 183.482(7), but we are doubtful that that would help. Instead, we find that "the correctness of the action may have been impaired by a material error in procedure or a failure to follow prescribed procedure” and remand for further agency action. ORS 183.482(7).
Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
618 P.2d 1003, 49 Or. App. 73, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 4051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-oregon-state-board-of-pharmacy-orctapp-1980.