Nichols v. Nichols

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedJuly 29, 1999
Docket03A01-9810-CV-00352
StatusPublished

This text of Nichols v. Nichols (Nichols v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Nichols, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

I N T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S A T K N O X V I L L E FILED July 29, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk

L A U R A M A Y S H A R K N I C H O L S ) W A S H I N G T O N C O U N T Y ) 0 3 A 0 1 - 9 8 1 0 - C V - 0 0 3 5 2 P l a i n t i f f - A p p e l l e e ) ) ) v . ) H O N . R I C H A R D J O H N S O N , ) C H A N C E L L O R ) C R A I G A L A N N I C H O L S ) ) D e f e n d a n t - A p p e l l a n t ) R E M A N D E D

C R A I G A L A N N I C H O L S , A p p e l l a n t , P r o S e

N O B R I E F F I L E D B Y T H E A P P E L L E E

O P I N I O N

H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P . J .

C r a i g A l a n N i c h o l s p u r p o r t s t o p e r f e c t a R u l e 3 a p p e a l

f r o m a j u d g m e n t o f t h e C i r c u i t C o u r t f o r W a s h i n g t o n C o u n t y ,

g r a n t i n g h i s w i f e L a u r a M a y s h a r k N i c h o l s a d i v o r c e , $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 a s

a l i m o n y i n s o l i d o , a n d d i v i d i n g t h e i r m a r i t a l p r o p e r t y . T h e

T r i a l C o u r t r e s e r v e d t h e i s s u e o f c h i l d v i s i t a t i o n a n d s u p p o r t b e c a u s e M r . N i c h o l s i s i n c a r c e r a t e d i n t h e p e n a l s y s t e m o f t h e

S t a t e o f T e n n e s s e e .

M r . N i c h o l s f i l e d a R u l e 3 a p p e a l q u e s t i o n i n g t h e a w a r d

o f t h e d i v o r c e , t h e f a i l u r e t o g r a n t h i m v i s i t a t i o n p r i v i l e g e s

w i t h h i s c h i l d r e n , t h e a w a r d o f a l i m o n y i n s o l i d o a n d t h e f a c t

t h a t h e d i d n o t r e c e i v e t h e p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y h e w a s a w a r d e d

u n d e r t h e d e c r e e .

I t a p p e a r s t h a t s u b s e q u e n t t o t h e d e c r e e b e i n g e n t e r e d ,

M r . N i c h o l s f i l e d a m o t i o n f o r a n e w t r i a l o r t o a l t e r a n d a m e n d

t h e f i n d i n g s o f t h e C h a n c e l l o r . T h e C h a n c e l l o r d e n i e d t h e m o t i o n

o n t h e g r o u n d t h a t i t w a s n o t t i m e l y b e c a u s e i t w a s n o t f i l e d

w i t h i n 3 0 d a y s a f t e r e n t r y o f t h e d e c r e e . H e a l s o r u l e d t h a t

e v e n i f i t h a d b e e n t i m e l y f i l e d i t w o u l d h a v e b e e n o v e r r u l e d .

T h e r e a f t e r , M r . N i c h o l s f i l e d a R u l e 6 0 m o t i o n s e e k i n g

t o s e t a s i d e t h e o r d e r d e n y i n g h i s m o t i o n f o r a n e w t r i a l o r t o

a l t e r a n d a m e n d t h e j u d g m e n t .

S t i l l l a t e r , b e c a u s e h e f e a r e d t h a t h e w o u l d b e b a r r e d

f r o m a p p e a l i n g f r o m t h e o r i g i n a l j u d g m e n t , h e f i l e d a n o t i c e o f

a p p e a l w h i c h b r o u g h t t h e c a s e t o t h i s C o u r t f o r c o n s i d e r a t i o n .

I n l i g h t o f t h e f a c t t h a t a R u l e 6 0 m o t i o n h a s b e e n

f i l e d a n d i s s t i l l p e n d i n g i n t h e T r i a l C o u r t , i t w o u l d b e

a p p r o p r i a t e i n t h e i n t e r e s t o f j u d i c i a l e c o n o m y t h a t t h e c a s e b e

2 r e m a n d e d t o t h e T r i a l C o u r t f o r d i s p o s i t i o n o f t h e R u l e 6 0

m o t i o n , w h i c h t h e r e a f t e r m a y b e a p p e a l e d b y a n y a g g r i e v e d p a r t y .

S e e S p e n c e v . A l l s t a t e I n s . C o . , 8 8 3 S . W . 2 d 5 8 6 ( T e n n . 1 9 9 4 ) . O f

c o u r s e , i f M r . N i c h o l s a p p e a l s , h i s f i r s t n o t i c e o f a p p e a l w h i c h

i n i t i a l l y b r o u g h t t h e c a s e h e r e w o u l d b e t i m e l y a n d e n a b l e t h i s

C o u r t t o a d d r e s s t h e m e r i t s o f t h a t a p p e a l a s w e l l a s d i s p o s i t i o n

o f t h e R u l e 6 0 m o t i o n s h o u l d i t b e a d v e r s e t o M r . N i c h o l s .

F o r t h e f o r e g o i n g r e a s o n s t h e c a s e i s r e m a n d e d t o t h e

T r i a l C o u r t f o r p r o c e e d i n g s n o t i n c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h i s o p i n i o n .

C o s t s o f a p p e a l a r e a d j u d g e d a g a i n s t M r . N i c h o l s .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H o u s t o n M . G o d d a r d , P . J .

C O N C U R :

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ H e r s c h e l P . F r a n k s , J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C h a r l e s D . S u s a n o , J r . , J .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Nichols v. Nichols, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-nichols-tennctapp-1999.