Nichols v. Nichols
This text of 10 Wend. 560 (Nichols v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The objection to the notice was held by Mr. Justice Sutherland to be well taken; but it appearing that the judgment was entered on 10th May, and two special terms having since elapsed, he refused to. grant the motion, saying that as this was an attempt to deprive the plaintiff of his judgment on the ground of mere irregularity, the defendant would be held to the strictest rules of proceeding; and having been guilty of laches in making his motion, he was not entitled to be heard.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Wend. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-nichols-nysupct-1833.