Nichols v. Nichols

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nichols v. Nichols

146 N.Y.S. 1102

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1914

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 146 N.Y.S. 1102 (Nichols v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. Nichols, 146 N.Y.S. 1102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the plaintiff executed an agreement whereby she received the conveyance of the property in East Fifth street in full satisfaction of all claim for support, which agreement was not delivered to the defendant until after the termination of this action, the order should be modified, so far as it provides for the payment of $75 monthly as in whole or in part an allowance to the plaintiff for her support, so that the decree shall provide that the said sum shall be paid for the support of the children alone, with leave, however, to the defendant, if he be so advised, to apply at Special Term for a reduction of said sum to such an amount as is proper for the support and maintenance of the children alone; and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. See, also, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1102.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As the plaintiff executed an agreement whereby she received the conveyance of the property in East Fifth street in full satisfaction of all claim for support, which agreement was not delivered to the defendant until after the termination of this action, the order should be modified, so far as it provides for the payment of $75 monthly as in whole or in part an allowance to the plaintiff for her support, so that the decree shall provide that the said sum shall be paid for the support of the children alone, with leave, however, to the defendant, if he be so advised, to apply at Special Term for a reduction of said sum to such an amount as is proper for the support and maintenance of the children alone; and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. See, also, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1102.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-nichols-nyappdiv-1914.