Nichols v. Nichols

20 So. 2d 72, 197 Miss. 302, 1944 Miss. LEXIS 301
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided December 11, 1944·No. No. 35710.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree granting a divorce. There was neither an answer nor demurrer to the bill of complaint. The bill of complaint contains no allegations bringing the case within any of the grounds for the granting of a divorce. On the contrary, if all of its allegation’s are true, no ground for divorce would appear therefrom. 1 The. decree must therefore be reversed. *304 Pease & Dwyer Co. v. Somers Planting Co., 130 Miss. 147, 93 So. 673; Odom v. Gulf & S. I. R. Co., 101 Miss. 642, 57 So. 626; Carrier Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. Quitman County, 156 Miss. 396, 124 So. 437, 125 So. 416, 66 A. L. R. 614; Smith v. Deas, 158 Miss. 111, 130 So. 105; United States F. & G. Co. v. Plumbing Wholesale Company, 175 Miss. 675, 166 So. 529.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Nichols, 20 So. 2d 72, 197 Miss. 302, 1944 Miss. LEXIS 301 (Mich. 1944).

20 So. 2d 72 (Nichols v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haralson v. Haralson
483 So. 2d 378 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1986)
Schneegass v. Schneegass
194 So. 2d 214 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1966)
Howard v. Howard
138 So. 2d 292 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1962)
Stringer v. Stringer
46 So. 2d 791 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1950)