Nichols v. Nichols-Johnson

78 A.D.3d 1679, 910 N.Y.S.2d 754
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 19, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 78 A.D.3d 1679 (Nichols v. Nichols-Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Nichols-Johnson, 78 A.D.3d 1679, 910 N.Y.S.2d 754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Timothy K. Mattison, J.H.O.), entered May 6, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, modified a previous order of custody.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously vacated without costs and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Steuben County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent paternal grandmother appeals from an order granting the petition seek[1680]*1680ing to modify a prior order of custody and visitation by awarding petitioner father primary physical custody of his three children with visitation to the grandmother. The attorney for the children has submitted new information, obtained during the pendency of this appeal, indicating that the father no longer wishes to pursue the petition. Although that information is not included in the record on appeal, we may “take notice of the new facts and allegations to the extent they indicate that the record before us is no longer sufficient for determining [the father’s] fitness and right to [primary physical custody] of [the children]” (Matter of Michael B., 80 NY2d 299, 318 [1992]; see also Matter of Shad S. [Amy C.Y.], 67 AD3d 1359 [2009]; Matter of Chow v Holmes, 63 AD3d 925 [2009]). We therefore vacate the order and remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Garni, Lindley and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Tamika B. v. Pamela C.
2017 NY Slip Op 4514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
GUNN, BRANDON L. v. GUNN, RACHEL S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Gunn v. Gunn
129 A.D.3d 1533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
S., GENA, MTR. OF
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
In re Gena S.
101 A.D.3d 1593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.3d 1679, 910 N.Y.S.2d 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-nichols-johnson-nyappdiv-2010.