Nichols v. Nichols

508 So. 2d 379, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 649, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7021
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 1987·No. No. 86-2681·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this interlocutory appeal in a dissolution of marriage action, the wife appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for temporary attorney’s fees. We affirm.

The evidence is to the effect that the wife has no present ability to pay substantial attorney’s fees and that the husband does have that ability. But this was a request for temporary attorney’s fees, and there has been no showing by the wife that she does not have the ability to be represented by counsel. We cannot say that under the circumstances of this case the trial court at this stage abused its discretion.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Nichols, 508 So. 2d 379, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 649, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7021 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

508 So. 2d 379 (Nichols v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Nichols
519 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)