Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A.

188 So. 3d 989, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6203, 2016 WL 1600347
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2016·No. 5D15-955·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Carter, 9 So.3d 1258, 1263-64 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding noncompetition clause in an employment agreement to be valid and enforceable; the language of the clause was clear and unambiguous, reasonably limited in time, reasonably limited in not precluding all competition, and the lack of a geographical limitation was not critical).

SAWAYA COHEN, and LAMBERT, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A., 188 So. 3d 989, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6203, 2016 WL 1600347 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

188 So. 3d 989 (Nichols v. Moore, Stephens, Lovelace, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. Carter
9 So. 3d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)