Nichols v. Miller-Lenfesty Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Nichols v. Miller-Lenfesty Supply Co.

138 So. 401, 103 Fla. 944, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1432

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 22, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Cubiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cubiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Nichols v. Miller-Lenfesty Supply Co., 138 So. 401, 103 Fla. 944, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1432 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

138 So. 401 (Nichols v. Miller-Lenfesty Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.