Nichols v. McAbee
This text of 30 Ga. 8 (Nichols v. McAbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court
delivering the opinion.
1. None of the Court felt any difficulty, in this case, in affirming the ruling that a demand, whose amount places it beyond the jurisdiction of a Justices’ Court, may be brought within the jurisdiction, by payments reducing it.
2. But whether an 'account, so reduced, is within the stat[10]*10ute allowing the plaintiff (under certain circumstances) to prove his demand by his own oath, was a more difficult question. I thought, and still think, that the case is not within that statute, upon a sound and safe construction of it; but my colleagues informed me that a different construction had prevailed in the Courts for a great number of years, and, with entire uniformity, to the extent of their knowledge on the subject. I was not prepared to dispute it, and therefore acquiesced in what seemed to be established by authority.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ga. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-mcabee-ga-1860.