Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.
632 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1994 WL 60845
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1994·No. No. 93-1117·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We reverse a final order granting defendant’s motion to enforce an oral settlement agreement.
It is clear from our examination of the record that the terms of a letter to be written by Appellee were an essential element of the settlement discussion. The record does not support a conclusion that Appellant’s attorney1 agreed to the terms imposed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nichols v. May Department Stores Co., 632 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1994 WL 60845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
632 So. 2d 293 (Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nastasi v. Thomas
88 So. 3d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Orchid Island Properties v. Wg Mills
889 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)