Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.
632 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1994 WL 60845
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 2, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1117
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 632 So. 2d 293 (Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nichols v. May Department Stores Co., 632 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1994 WL 60845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
We reverse a final order granting defendant’s motion to enforce an oral settlement agreement.
It is clear from our examination of the record that the terms of a letter to be written by Appellee were an essential element of the settlement discussion. The record does not support a conclusion that Appellant’s attorney1 agreed to the terms imposed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nastasi v. Thomas
88 So. 3d 407 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Orchid Island Properties v. Wg Mills
889 So. 2d 142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 So. 2d 293, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1693, 1994 WL 60845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-may-department-stores-co-fladistctapp-1994.