Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.

702 A.2d 643, 243 Conn. 938, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 22, 1997·No. SC 15799·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The intervening plaintiff Henkels & McCoy’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, [939] 46 Conn. App. 712 (AC 16325) is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15799. James D. Moran, Jr., in support of the petition. John B. Farley and Kevin M. Roche, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1997

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a statute of limitation defense may successfully be raised against an employer who has intervened, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-293, in a cause of action that had been brought within the statutory time limitation by the originating employee-plaintiff?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc., 702 A.2d 643, 243 Conn. 938, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 455 (Colo. 1997).

702 A.2d 643 (Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.
716 A.2d 71 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Doe v. Yale University, No. Cv-90-0305365-S (Dec. 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13731 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)