Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.

702 A.2d 643, 243 Conn. 938, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 455
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 22, 1997
DocketSC 15799
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 702 A.2d 643 (Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc., 702 A.2d 643, 243 Conn. 938, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 455 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The intervening plaintiff Henkels & McCoy’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, [939]*93946 Conn. App. 712 (AC 16325) is granted, limited to the following issue:

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15799. James D. Moran, Jr., in support of the petition. John B. Farley and Kevin M. Roche, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1997

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that a statute of limitation defense may successfully be raised against an employer who has intervened, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-293, in a cause of action that had been brought within the statutory time limitation by the originating employee-plaintiff?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols v. Lighthouse Restaurant, Inc.
716 A.2d 71 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Doe v. Yale University, No. Cv-90-0305365-S (Dec. 1, 1997)
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 13731 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 A.2d 643, 243 Conn. 938, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-lighthouse-restaurant-inc-conn-1997.