Nichols v. Jamestown Mutual Insurance
This text of 271 A.D.2d 1059 (Nichols v. Jamestown Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence, coupled with the admission in the answer, was sufficient to make a question [1060]*1060of fact as to the authority of the claims adjuster. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the pleadings and the evidence do not support a finding of the authority of Snyder to act on behalf of the defendant in making the agreement alleged. (The judgment appealed from is for plaintiff in an action for breach of contract.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Dowling, Harris, McCum and Larkin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 1059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-jamestown-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1947.