Nichols v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad

38 Ind. 279
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Ind. 279 (Nichols v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad, 38 Ind. 279 (Ind. 1871).

Opinion

Downey, J.

For the reasons given in the case of Straughan v. The Indianapolis and St. Louis Railroad Com[280]*280pany, ante, p. 185, the questions in the cases being the same, the judgment in this case is affirmed, with five per cent, damages and costs.

W. A. McKenzie, for appellant. L. Ritter and M. A, Osborn, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Ind. 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-indianapolis-st-louis-railroad-ind-1871.