Nichols v. Florida Parole Commission

4 So. 3d 1247, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1293, 2009 WL 400392
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2009·No. 1D08-1093·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order which denied a petition for writ of mandamus which challenged the revocation of his conditional release supervision. We grant the writ.

When petitioner’s conditional release supervision was revoked, neither the Florida Parole Commission nor the FPC hearing examiner made a finding that the violation was willful and substantial as required by Mathis v. Florida Parole Commission, 944 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). On mandamus review, the circuit court remanded the cause to FPC to make that finding. After the hearing examiner determined that the violation was willful and substantial, FPC adopted that finding and the circuit court denied the petition for writ of mandamus. Due process is violated where a cause is remanded to FPC for a determination of whether the violation is willful and substantial and the circuit court fails to allow the inmate an opportunity to be heard before denying relief. See Crosby v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 975 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

Accordingly, we grant the writ, quash the order of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings.

WEBSTER, BROWNING, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Florida Parole Commission, 4 So. 3d 1247, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1293, 2009 WL 400392 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

4 So. 3d 1247 (Nichols v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Collins v. Florida Parole Commission
14 So. 3d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)