Nichols v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Nichols v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 256

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 6, 1980

DocketCC-79-653

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ct. Cl. 256 (Nichols v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols v. Department of Highways, 13 Ct. Cl. 256 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

GARDEN, JUDGE:

At about 8:00 p.m. on October 20, 1979, the claimant was driving her husband’s 1972 Dodge automobile east on Patteson Drive in Morgantown when she struck a large hole, causing damage to the exhaust system of the car. The claimant seeks to recover damages in the sum of $81.24.

The State is neither the insurer nor the guarantor of the safety of motorists traveling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). For the respondent to be held liable, it must be proven that the respondent had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect in the road and a reasonable amount of time to take corrective action. Davis v. Dept. of Highways, 11 Ct. Cl. 150 (1977). Since the claimant did not meet that burden of proof, this claim must be denied.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GARDEN, JUDGE:

At about 8:00 p.m. on October 20, 1979, the claimant was driving her husband’s 1972 Dodge automobile east on Patteson Drive in Morgantown when she struck a large hole, causing damage to the exhaust system of the car. The claimant seeks to recover damages in the sum of $81.24.

The State is neither the insurer nor the guarantor of the safety of motorists traveling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). For the respondent to be held liable, it must be proven that the respondent had actual or constructive knowledge of the defect in the road and a reasonable amount of time to take corrective action. Davis v. Dept. of Highways, 11 Ct. Cl. 150 (1977). Since the claimant did not meet that burden of proof, this claim must be denied.

Claim disallowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ct. Cl. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack