Nichols v. Cosset
1 Root 294
Opinion
This deed is not usurious within the statute, for although 7 per cent, is expressed in the mortgage, and the mortgage was given in this state, where 6 per cent, is the lawful interest only; yet this is a security to pay the plaintiff only what he was lawfully bound to pay for said George in New York.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nichols v. Cosset, 1 Root 294 (Colo. 1791).
1 Root 294 (Nichols v. Cosset) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Santoro v. Osman
174 A.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1961)