Nichols v. Cosset
1 Root 294
This text of 1 Root 294 (Nichols v. Cosset) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nichols v. Cosset, 1 Root 294 (Colo. 1791).
Opinion
This deed is not usurious within the statute, for although 7 per cent, is expressed in the mortgage, and the mortgage was given in this state, where 6 per cent, is the lawful interest only; yet this is a security to pay the plaintiff only what he was lawfully bound to pay for said George in New York.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Santoro v. Osman
174 A.2d 800 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1961)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Root 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-cosset-conn-1791.