Nichols v. Claiborne

39 Tex. 363
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 39 Tex. 363 (Nichols v. Claiborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Claiborne, 39 Tex. 363 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Ogden, P. J.

There is no error in the judgment of the court in sustaining and perpetuating the injunction in this case.

The statute of 1866, at least, by a liberal construction would have exempted one vehicle from forced sale, whether it was a wagon, in the ordinary meaning of that word, or a carriage, provided that was the only vehicle owned or possessed by the party claiming the exemption•, and with this construction of the statute of 1866, the statute of 1870 could hardly be claimed as impairing the obligation of a contract tinder the facts stated in this case.

The carriage or buggy levied upon in this case is the only vehicle owned by the appellee, and we think under either statute reférred to he had a right to claim one as exempted from forced sale. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Aeeibmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parsons v. Hartman
39 L.R.A. 98 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1894)
Driggs' Bank v. Norwood
49 Ark. 136 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1886)
Edgecomb v. His Creditors
19 Nev. 149 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1885)
Muir v. Howell
37 N.J. Eq. 39 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Tex. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-claiborne-tex-1873.