Nichols v. City of Chicago

61 N.E. 435, 192 Ill. 290
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided October 24, 1901·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a special assessment proceeding brought by the defendant in error for curbing with curbstones, grading and paving West Madison street from Paulina street to Western avenue. The ordinance, under which the special assessment was levied, does not specify the size or quality of the flat stones, on which the curb-stones are' to be bedded, and is objected to upon that ground. This objection was sustained in Lusk v. City of Chicago, 176 Ill. 207, and Davidson v. City of Chicago, 178 id. 582.

For the reasons stated in the above mentioned cases, the judgment of confirmation here is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance With the views expressed in those cases.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. City of Chicago, 61 N.E. 435, 192 Ill. 290 (Ill. 1901).

61 N.E. 435 (Nichols v. City of Chicago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lusk v. City of Chicago
52 N.E. 54 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)