Nichols v. Chandler

55 Ga. 369
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Judge.

Chandler sued Nichols for a tract of land. His title turned on the construction of an instrument, whether it was a deed or a will; if a deed, he might recover; if a will, he could not. The instrument by itself may be doubtful of interpretation, but construed in the light of the proof as to its delivery, we think all doubt is removed. The character of the [370]*370instrument and the circumstances surrounding its execution are sufficiently set out in the head-note for an intelligent understanding of our judgment and the reasons on which it is based. We hold it to be a will, and reverse the judgment of the court below.

Judgment reversed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols v. Chandler, 55 Ga. 369 (Ga. 1875).

55 Ga. 369 (Nichols v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Beffa
201 P. 616 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
Dexter v. Witte
119 N.W. 891 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Estate of Williams
5 Coffey 1 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)
Williams v. Tolbert
66 Ga. 127 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)