Nichols v. . Cartwright

6 N.C. 137
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1812
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 N.C. 137 (Nichols v. . Cartwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. . Cartwright, 6 N.C. 137 (N.C. 1812).

Opinion

Tavxor, Chief-Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

A rule applied to chattels, is, that where a remainder is limited by such words, as if applied to realty would constitute an estate tail, the person to' whom it is given takes the property absolutely. The deed before us does not permit a doubt as to the intention of the maker, for the words are precisely such as would amount to an estate tail in real property. Absala Sawyer is to take the use and labor of the slave and her increase during her natural life, and at her death they are to go to the heirs of her body lawfully begotten. This is exactly the way in which an estate tail in lands would subsist, the tenant having it in his power to defeat his issue only by a fine and recovery, or lineal warranty with assets. From the whole tenor of the deed, the legal construction is, that Absala Sawyer took the negro girl absolutely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riegel v. Lyerly
143 S.E.2d 65 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.C. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-cartwright-nc-1812.