Nichols v. Billington

268 F. App'x 1
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 19, 2008
DocketNo. 07-5365
StatusPublished

This text of 268 F. App'x 1 (Nichols v. Billington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols v. Billington, 268 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 16, 2007, be affirmed. Appellant has failed to demonstrate error in the district court’s conclusion that her case is barred by res judicata. See Nichols v. Billington, 402 F.Supp.2d 48 (D.D.C.2005), aff'd, No. 05-5326, 2006 WL 3018044 (D.C.Cir. Mar. 7, 2006).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nichols v. Billington
402 F. Supp. 2d 48 (District of Columbia, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-billington-cadc-2008.