Nichols v. Baldwin
This text of 1 Root 496 (Nichols v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plea in abatement was judged to be sufficient, upon the ground that there were no parties before this court, but those who were parties to the writ of error; that there was no cause here but that which was brought up by the writ of [497]*497error and reversed; that the Baldwins were not parties to the-writ of error, nor was the canse as it respected them, brought up by the writ of error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Root 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-baldwin-conn-1793.