Nichols v. Anguera
This text of 2 Miles 290 (Nichols v. Anguera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause of action was joint against the partners whoever they were. If it be true, as averred by plaintiff, [291]*291that Curran was a . partner, whether dormant or otherwise, the taking of the confession of the judgment from the two copartners is an absolute discharge of Curran, which we have no right to nullify. Without the consent of all parties, we have no right to interfere.
Rule discharged.
See Smith v. Black, 9 S. & R. 142; Lewis v. Williams, 6 Whart. R. 264.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Miles 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-v-anguera-pactcomplphilad-1839.