Nichols v. Anguera
2 Miles 290
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County·Decided April 13, 1839·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The cause of action was joint against the partners whoever they were. If it be true, as averred by plaintiff, [291]*291that Curran was a . partner, whether dormant or otherwise, the taking of the confession of the judgment from the two copartners is an absolute discharge of Curran, which we have no right to nullify. Without the consent of all parties, we have no right to interfere.
Rule discharged.
See Smith v. Black, 9 S. & R. 142; Lewis v. Williams, 6 Whart. R. 264.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nichols v. Anguera, 2 Miles 290 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1839).
2 Miles 290 (Nichols v. Anguera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gaut v. Reed Bros. & Co.
24 Tex. 46 (Texas Supreme Court, 1859)