Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans

Missouri Court of Appeals

Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans

129 S.W. 1199, 150 Mo. App. 88, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 675

DecidedJune 28, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.W. 1199 (Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans, 129 S.W. 1199, 150 Mo. App. 88, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

GOODE, J.

This appeal was filed to the October term, 1907, has been continued five times by stipulation of counsel and was not submitted for decision until February 8th of the present year, which facts account for the delay in disposing of it. We have read the heavy abstract and find the appeal should not have been taken; for the facts and legal points involved are identical with those reported in Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans, 116 Mo. App. 693, 93 S. W. 827. This action was instituted on three notes given for the purchase price of machinery described in the opinion on the former appeal, taken in an action on. another note given for the same machinery. In the decision of that appeal we considered the propositions of law now raised and as w,e are satisfied with the conclusions then reached, we will not re-examine the points.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOODE, J.

This appeal was filed to the October term, 1907, has been continued five times by stipulation of counsel and was not submitted for decision until February 8th of the present year, which facts account for the delay in disposing of it. We have read the heavy abstract and find the appeal should not have been taken; for the facts and legal points involved are identical with those reported in Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Bryeans, 116 Mo. App. 693, 93 S. W. 827. This action was instituted on three notes given for the purchase price of machinery described in the opinion on the former appeal, taken in an action on. another note given for the same machinery. In the decision of that appeal we considered the propositions of law now raised and as w,e are satisfied with the conclusions then reached, we will not re-examine the points.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.W. 1199, 150 Mo. App. 88, 1910 Mo. App. LEXIS 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-shepard-co-v-bryeans-moctapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack