Nichols

31 N.E. 683, 157 Mass. 20, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 7
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 23, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 31 N.E. 683 (Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichols, 31 N.E. 683, 157 Mass. 20, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 7 (Mass. 1892).

Opinion

Barker, J.

It is enough to show that the original investment of the trust funds in the mortgage was improper, that it was a transaction by which the trustee bought of himself a mortgage upon property which, at the time, was worth several thousand dollars less than the amount of the fund which he so invested in the mortgage.

The acts of his cestuis que trust in authorizing the appellant to bid off the property for them, and in accepting a conveyance of it to one of them for the benefit of all, cannot avail the appellant, for the reason that the cestuis que trust acted solely on the false representations of the appellant as to the value of the property, and, upon finding the real state of the facts, promptly demanded that he should take back the property, and account for the sum invested in the mortgage.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodge v. Mackintosh
248 Mass. 181 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
McKim v. Glover
37 N.E. 443 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.E. 683, 157 Mass. 20, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichols-mass-1892.