Nicholls v. Warfield
18 F. Cas. 182, 2 D.C. 429, 2 Cranch 429
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedOctober 15, 1823
StatusPublished
This text of 18 F. Cas. 182 (Nicholls v. Warfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nicholls v. Warfield, 18 F. Cas. 182, 2 D.C. 429, 2 Cranch 429 (circtddc 1823).
Opinion
(nem. con.) decided, in conformity with the case of Wetzel v. Bussard, 11 Wheat. 309, and Jenkins v. Boyle, in this Court at June term, 1816, (ante, 120,) and Clementson v. Williams, 8 Cranch, 72, that there was not evidence of such a promise as would take the case out of the statute of limitations.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clementson v. Williams
12 U.S. 72 (Supreme Court, 1814)
Wetzell v. Bussard
24 U.S. 309 (Supreme Court, 1826)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 182, 2 D.C. 429, 2 Cranch 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholls-v-warfield-circtddc-1823.