Nicholls v. Hults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicholls v. Hults

13 A.D.2d 1009, 218 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10134

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 1009 (Nicholls v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholls v. Hults, 13 A.D.2d 1009, 218 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, which revoked the petitioner’s operator’s license (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 510, subd. 3, par. [e]) on the ground of gross negligence. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 24, 1961, made pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur; Pette, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, there was no substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner was operating her motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner at the time and place of the occurrence here involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the determination of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York, which revoked the petitioner’s operator’s license (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 510, subd. 3, par. [e]) on the ground of gross negligence. By order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 24, 1961, made pursuant to section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act, the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur; Pette, J., dissents and votes to annul the determination, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, there was no substantial evidence to support the determination that the petitioner was operating her motor vehicle in a grossly negligent manner at the time and place of the occurrence here involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 1009, 218 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholls-v-hults-nyappdiv-1961.