Nicholl v. Littlefield
60 Cal. 238, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 434
Opinion
The only question to which our attention is called in this case relates to the decision of the Court below in granting a nonsuit. That the cause took this course on the trial appears from a recital in the judgment entry found in the transcript. There is no statement or bill of exceptions setting forth the evidence oh which the Court determined to grant the motion for a nonsuit. Such being the case, the ruling of the Court below can not be reviewed here. (Levy v. Getleson, 27 Cal. 685; Ringgold v..Haven, 1 id. 108.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicholl v. Littlefield, 60 Cal. 238, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 434 (Cal. 1882).
60 Cal. 238 (Nicholl v. Littlefield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.
71 P.2d 817 (California Supreme Court, 1937)
Meyer v. Foster
81 P. 402 (California Supreme Court, 1905)
Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.
19 P. 174 (California Supreme Court, 1888)