Nicholhaus v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nicholhaus v. Doe

261 A.D. 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8575

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1020 (Nicholhaus v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholhaus v. Doe, 261 A.D. 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8575 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely served. From the argument and the admissions contained in the affidavits of appellants’ attorney it would appear that the order appealed from was entered on December 30,1940, and a copy thereof personally served on the appellants’ attorney on that day. The notice of appeal was served by mail on January 31, 1941. There is some confusion of dates in the papers attached to the motion for dismissal and under the circumstances it seems clear that appellants were not entitled to add three days to the thirty-day period because the order appealed from was personally served. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not timely served. From the argument and the admissions contained in the affidavits of appellants’ attorney it would appear that the order appealed from was entered on December 30,1940, and a copy thereof personally served on the appellants’ attorney on that day. The notice of appeal was served by mail on January 31, 1941. There is some confusion of dates in the papers attached to the motion for dismissal and under the circumstances it seems clear that appellants were not entitled to add three days to the thirty-day period because the order appealed from was personally served. Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Sehenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1020, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholhaus-v-doe-nyappdiv-1941.