Nicholas Wooten v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Nicholas Wooten v. State

DecidedJuly 21, 2010

Docket12-10-00144-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Nicholas Wooten v. State (Nicholas Wooten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nicholas Wooten v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00144-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS NICHOLAS WOOTEN, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in four paragraphs of the State’s application to proceed to final adjudication, and the trial court assessed punishment at ten years of imprisonment for the underlying offense (burglary of a habitation). We have received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. Appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal is included in the record and is signed by Appellant, his counsel, and the trial court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered July 21, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-10-00144-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS NICHOLAS WOOTEN, APPELLANT ' APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ' SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded true to the allegations in four paragraphs of the State’s application to proceed to final adjudication, and the trial court assessed punishment at ten years of imprisonment for the underlying offense (burglary of a habitation). We have received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. Appellant’s waiver of his right to appeal is included in the record and is signed by Appellant, his counsel, and the trial court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered July 21, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Nicholas Wooten v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-wooten-v-state-texapp-2010.