Nicholas v. Travis
297 A.D.2d 816, 748 N.Y.2d 70, 748 N.Y.S.2d 70, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8941
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2002·Published
Opinion
The determination under review was made in accordance with the law and was not irrational (see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476; Matter of Thomas v New York State Div. of Parole, 286 AD2d 393; Matter of Walker v Travis, 252 AD2d 360; Matter of Carrion v New York State Bd. of Parole, 210 AD2d 403).
The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nicholas v. Travis, 297 A.D.2d 816, 748 N.Y.2d 70, 748 N.Y.S.2d 70, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 816 (Nicholas v. Travis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
MATTER OF SILMON v. Travis
741 N.E.2d 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Carrion v. New York State Board of Parole
210 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Walker v. Travis
252 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Thomas v. New York State Division of Parole
286 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)