Nicholas v. Travis

297 A.D.2d 816, 748 N.Y.2d 70, 748 N.Y.S.2d 70, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8941

This text of 297 A.D.2d 816 (Nicholas v. Travis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nicholas v. Travis, 297 A.D.2d 816, 748 N.Y.2d 70, 748 N.Y.S.2d 70, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The determination under review was made in accordance with the law and was not irrational (see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476; Matter of Thomas v New York State Div. of Parole, 286 AD2d 393; Matter of Walker v Travis, 252 AD2d 360; Matter of Carrion v New York State Bd. of Parole, 210 AD2d 403).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF SILMON v. Travis
741 N.E.2d 501 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
Carrion v. New York State Board of Parole
210 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Walker v. Travis
252 A.D.2d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Thomas v. New York State Division of Parole
286 A.D.2d 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 816, 748 N.Y.2d 70, 748 N.Y.S.2d 70, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8941, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-v-travis-nyappdiv-2002.