Nicholas v. TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc.

D. Nevada

Nicholas v. TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 14, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-01749·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6 MELVIN NICHOLAS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01749-CDS-NJK ’ Plaintiff(s), ORDER Vv. [Docket No. 5] 10 INC. FINANCE CORPORATE SERVICES, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to transfer this case to the Southern District 13] of Georgia under the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Docket No. 5. The motion was 14]| filed on October 30, 2023, making the deadline to respond November 13, 2023. See Local Rule 15] 7-2(b). Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, the motion to transfer is GRANTED as 16] unopposed. Local Rule 7-2(d).' This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Southern District 17|| of Georgia. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: November 14, 2023 . tig Nancy J. Koppe\ 21 United StatesMagistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 ' The undersigned resolves the motion through issuance of an order as it is well-settled that a magistrate judge possesses the authority to decide a motion to transfer. See, e.g., Pavao v. Unifund CCR Partners, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1238, 1241 n.1 (S.D. Cal. 2013) (collecting cases).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6 MELVIN NICHOLAS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01749-CDS-NJK ’ Plaintiff(s), ORDER Vv. [Docket No. 5] 10 INC. FINANCE CORPORATE SERVICES, 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to transfer this case to the Southern District 13] of Georgia under the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Docket No. 5. The motion was 14]| filed on October 30, 2023, making the deadline to respond November 13, 2023. See Local Rule 15] 7-2(b). Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, the motion to transfer is GRANTED as 16] unopposed. Local Rule 7-2(d).' This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Southern District 17|| of Georgia. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: November 14, 2023 . tig Nancy J. Koppe\ 21 United StatesMagistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 ' The undersigned resolves the motion through issuance of an order as it is well-settled that a magistrate judge possesses the authority to decide a motion to transfer. See, e.g., Pavao v. Unifund CCR Partners, 934 F. Supp. 2d 1238, 1241 n.1 (S.D. Cal. 2013) (collecting cases).

Nicholas v. TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc., (D. Nev. 2023).

Pincite

Nicholas v. TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc. (Nicholas v. TMX Finance Corporate Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related