Nicholas v. Ozmint

Fourth Circuit

Nicholas v. Ozmint

240 F. App'x 593

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2007·No. No. 06-7667·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ron Tearia Nicholas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholas v. Ozmint, No. 8:05-cv-03472-RBH, 2006 WL 2711852 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2006). We deny Nicholas’s motion for production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ron Tearia Nicholas appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nicholas v. Ozmint, No. 8:05-cv-03472-RBH, 2006 WL 2711852 (D.S.C. Sept. 20, 2006). We deny Nicholas’s motion for production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Nicholas v. Ozmint, 240 F. App'x 593 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

240 F. App'x 593 (Nicholas v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.