Nicholas v. J. F. Mellon Construction Co.
This text of 241 A.D. 771 (Nicholas v. J. F. Mellon Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The complaint was dismissed for the reason that the plaintiffs had not proved damages. They were entitled, upon the proof, to recover the usuable value of their apparatus during the period they were wrongly deprived of its use by the defendant. (Denehy v. Pasarella, 230 App. Div. 707: Dettmar v. Burns Bros., 111 Misc. 189; Naughton Mulgrew Co. v. Westchester F. Co., 105 id. 595, 599; Allen v. Fox, 51 N. Y. 562; Redmond v. A. M. Co., 121 id. 415.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-v-j-f-mellon-construction-co-nyappdiv-1934.