NICHOLAS M. DUNGEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of NICHOLAS M. DUNGEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA (NICHOLAS M. DUNGEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
NICHOLAS M. DUNGEY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-2603 LT Case No. 2016-CF-000687
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 28, 2023
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County, R. Lee Smith, Judge.
Nicholas M. Dungey, Moore Haven, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Nicholas M. Dungey, appeals the summary denial of his
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion in which he alleged that
counsel was ineffective by failing to convey multiple favorable plea offers to him. Appellant further alleges that he was prejudiced because he accepted
a plea offer that is less favorable than the offers that counsel failed to convey.
Finally, he claims in his motion that: (1) he would have accepted the more
favorable offers, (2) the State would not have withdrawn the offers, and (3)
the court would have accepted a plea involving one of the more favorable
offers.
The trial court summarily denied the claim, reasoning that the motion
was legally insufficient and, alternatively, that exhibits attached to the motion
and the documents attached to the order of denial conclusively refuted the
claim. We conclude that the motion, although inartfully drafted, is legally
sufficient and that the exhibits attached to the motion and order do not
conclusively refute the claim. See, e.g., Tribbitt v. State, 339 So. 3d 1029
(Fla. 2d DCA 2022); Petit-Homme v. State, 205 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 4th DCA
2016). We therefore reverse the denial and remand for an evidentiary
hearing or the attachment of other records conclusively refuting the claim.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NICHOLAS M. DUNGEY vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-m-dungey-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.