Nicholas Hanegan, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
This text of Nicholas Hanegan, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Nicholas Hanegan, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA
No. 15-1775 Filed September 14, 2016
NICHOLAS HANEGAN, Applicant-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Eliza J. Ovrom,
Judge.
Nicholas Hanegan appeals an adverse summary judgment ruling on his
application for postconviction relief. AFFIRMED.
Joey T. Hoover of Hoover Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Winterset, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Bridget A. Chambers, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee State.
Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Mullins and Bower, JJ. 2
MULLINS, Judge.
Nicholas Hanegan appeals an adverse summary judgment ruling on his
application for postconviction relief, claiming he was entitled to an evidentiary
hearing. On our review, we conclude the judgment of the district court was
correct and no error of law appears. We affirm without opinion. See Iowa R.
App. P. 6.1203(a), (d). Furthermore, even if Hanegan’s claim of newly
discovered evidence had merit, the claim is barred by not having been raised
within three years of its discovery. See Iowa Code § 822.3.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nicholas Hanegan, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-hanegan-applicant-appellant-v-state-of-iowa-iowactapp-2016.