Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn Ahola
This text of Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn Ahola (Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn Ahola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 20, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162338-9 & (12) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh NICHOLAS DAVID BURNETT, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 162338 COA: 354991 Genesee CC: 14-312262-DP TRACY LYNN AHOLA, Defendant-Appellee, and DEREK AHOLA, Defendant.
_____________________________________/
NICHOLAS DAVID BURNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 162339 COA: 354996 Genesee CC: 14-312262-DP TRACY LYNN AHOLA and DEREK AHOLA, Defendants-Appellees.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 30, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 20, 2021 b0119 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn Ahola, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-david-burnett-v-tracy-lynn-ahola-mich-2021.