Nicholas C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

D. Minnesota

Nicholas C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided June 2, 2026·No. 0:25-cv-02287·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

NICHOLAS C., Case No. 25-cv-2287 (LMP/DTS) Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 23, of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Nicholas C.’s Complaint, ECF No. 1. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon the files, records, and proceedings in the matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 23) is ADOPTED; 2. Nicholas C.’s Request for Relief (ECF No. 9) is DENIED; 3. Commissioner Bisignano’s Request for Relief (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED;

4. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 2, 2026 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

NICHOLAS C., Case No. 25-cv-2287 (LMP/DTS) Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), ECF No. 23, of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff Nicholas C.’s Complaint, ECF No. 1. No objections have been filed to the R&R in the time period permitted, and it is therefore reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon the files, records, and proceedings in the matter, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The R&R (ECF No. 23) is ADOPTED; 2. Nicholas C.’s Request for Relief (ECF No. 9) is DENIED; 3. Commissioner Bisignano’s Request for Relief (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED;

4. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: June 2, 2026 s/Laura M. Provinzino Laura M. Provinzino United States District Judge

Nicholas C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, (mnd 2026).

Pincite

Nicholas C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (Nicholas C. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related