NICHOLAS BLAZEVICH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of NICHOLAS BLAZEVICH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (NICHOLAS BLAZEVICH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed November 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1795 Lower Tribunal No. 20-657 A-K ________________
Nicholas Blazevich, Petitioner,
vs.
The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction - Habeas Corpus.
Nicholas Blazevich, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and David Llanes, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before HENDON, MILLER and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Following review of the petition and the response thereto, it is ordered
that said petition is hereby dismissed as improper. See Henry v. Santana,
62 So. 3d 1122, 1126 n.3 (Fla. 2011) (“The purpose of a habeas corpus
proceeding is to inquire into the legality of the petitioner’s present detention.”
(quoting Sneed v. Mayo, 69 So. 2d 653, 654 (Fla. 1954))); Patterson v.
Christensen, 183 So. 18, 19 (Fla. 1938) (“Habeas corpus is not the proper
proceeding in which to challenge venue . . . .”); King v. State, 695 So. 2d
1299, 1299 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (“[C]laims of ineffective assistance of trial
counsel are not cognizable in a petition for habeas corpus . . . .”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
NICHOLAS BLAZEVICH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-blazevich-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.