Nicholas Alderete v. State
This text of Nicholas Alderete v. State (Nicholas Alderete v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-09-00301-CR & 04-09-00302-CR
Nicholas ALDERETE, Appellant
v.
STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2008-CR-0236A & 2008-CR-0237A Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 12, 2009
DISMISSED
Pursuant to plea-bargain agreements, appellant Nicholas Alderete pled nolo contendere to
the offenses of aggravated robbery in trial court cause numbers 2008-CR-0236A and 2008-CR-
0237A, and was sentenced in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreements. In each case,
the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain
case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). 04-09-00301-CR & 04-09-00302-CR
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) provides that “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if
a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record
under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Thus, this court, after consolidating the appeals, warned
Alderete his appeals would be dismissed unless amended trial court certifications showing he had
the right of appeal were made part of the appellate records. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174,
177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court
certifications have been filed. However, Alderete’s appellate counsel has filed letters in each case
stating she has reviewed the appellate records and this court has no choice but to dismiss the appeals.
We agree with Alderete’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss the appeals.
Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nicholas Alderete v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nicholas-alderete-v-state-texapp-2009.