Nichol v. Royal National Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nichol v. Royal National Bank

40 A.D.2d 660, 336 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 660 (Nichol v. Royal National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nichol v. Royal National Bank, 40 A.D.2d 660, 336 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 31, 1971, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissal of the complaint, or alternate relief, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint dismissed. Appellant shall recover of respondents $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. If plaintiffs have any cause of action at all, on this record it can only be derived from the Gamble consolidated mortgage, which consisted of two mortgages dated May 1, 1957 and May 17, 1957. However, by assignment, absolute in form, dated June 10, 1966, plaintiffs assigned whatever interest they had therein to the Merchants Bank which, thereafter, executed a release to the mortgagor. Under the circumstances plaintiffs no longer have any interest in the Gamble property and are without standing to bring this action. Concur — McNally, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 31, 1971, denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissal of the complaint, or alternate relief, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the complaint dismissed. Appellant shall recover of respondents $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. If plaintiffs have any cause of action at all, on this record it can only be derived from the Gamble consolidated mortgage, which consisted of two mortgages dated May 1, 1957 and May 17, 1957. However, by assignment, absolute in form, dated June 10, 1966, plaintiffs assigned whatever interest they had therein to the Merchants Bank which, thereafter, executed a release to the mortgagor. Under the circumstances plaintiffs no longer have any interest in the Gamble property and are without standing to bring this action. Concur — McNally, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Eager and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 660, 336 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichol-v-royal-national-bank-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack