Nichol v. Bair

626 P.2d 761, 1981 Colo. App. LEXIS 683
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 26, 1981
DocketNo. 80CA0651
StatusPublished

This text of 626 P.2d 761 (Nichol v. Bair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nichol v. Bair, 626 P.2d 761, 1981 Colo. App. LEXIS 683 (Colo. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their complaint and the dissolution of a temporary restraining order. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in finding that it lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were removed from their positions of Captain and Co-captain of a captaincy district within the Democratic Party of Adams County. They sued defendants, officials of the Democratic Party of Adams County, for a temporary restraining order pending their appeal to the state central committee of the Democratic Party. Plaintiffs claimed that the Party’s procedural rules had not been followed and that they would suffer irreparable harm if a temporary restraining order was not issued.

The statute in effect at the time of this dispute, § 1-14-109(1), C.R.S.1973,1 provided:

“The state central committee of any political party in this state has full power to pass upon and determine all controversies concerning the regularity of the organization of that party ... All such determinations upon the part of the state central committee shall be final.”

Thus, the courts have no jurisdiction to hear this dispute.

“That the state central committee of a political party, or the state convention, as the case may be, is now the sole tribunal to determine such controversies as is here presented is, to our mind, clear beyond all doubt, and, as a necessary sequence, the courts do not have concurrent jurisdiction in the premises.” People ex rel. Lowry v. District Court, 32 Colo. 15, 20, 74 P. 896, 898 (1903).

Plaintiffs’ other contentions are without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

PIERCE and VAN CISE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 P.2d 761, 1981 Colo. App. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nichol-v-bair-coloctapp-1981.