Nica Acupuncture, P.C. v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co.
This text of Nica Acupuncture, P.C. v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co. (Nica Acupuncture, P.C. v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, Respondent.
Law Offices of Damin J. Toell, P.C. (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices of Buratti, Rothenberg & Burns (Konstantinos Tsirkas of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered July 7, 2017. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.
For the reasons stated in Ocean One Physical Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Maxim Savelyev v 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-1778 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 02, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nica Acupuncture, P.C. v. 21st Century Centennial Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nica-acupuncture-pc-v-21st-century-centennial-ins-co-nyappterm-2019.