Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 14, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0902·Published

Opinion

FILEE

UNITEI) sTATEs I)ISTRICT coURT AUG 1 4 20?2 FoR THE I)ISTRICT 0F CGLUMBIA C,e,k, U S_ mgmt & saw q Courts for the District of Ct `=»'“-.,»:‘ JAMES R. NIBLoCK, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Acti0n No. l2-902 FEDERAL BUREAU oF PRlsoNs, i Defendant. § MEM0RANDUM 0P1N10N

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiff s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperz`s, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). To date, the plaintiff has not submitted the required financial information Accordingly, the C0urt will dismiss the

complaint and this action. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

U&t¢»

United%fates D'istrict Judge

DATE; Y/ ‘ /,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2012).

Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Niblock v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.